Judicial Review: The United States Court Case Of Marbury V Madison

downloadDownload
  • Words 450
  • Page 1
Download PDF

Judicial review is the intensity of the courts to render an official conclusion when there is a contention of elucidation of the Constitution or laws between the courts and Congress, the courts and the official branch, or the courts and the states. In more straightforward terms judicial review is the intensity of the courts to survey and, if fundamental, proclaim activities of the administrative and official branches invalid or unconstitutional.

“Judicial Review enables the Judicial Branch to tell the other branches, ‘no, you cannot do that, without my consent.’ It is also questionable on the grounds that it was not expressly written in the constitution, it was a production of James Madison so as to extend the intensity of the Judicial part of the government. He truly composed it into law that he has more power by avocation of something he made up as if saying, ‘you cannot do this since I say as much, and I have the right to say so because I say I do.’ that is the reason it is so controversial.”(Michaela, 2014)

Click to get a unique essay

Our writers can write you a new plagiarism-free essay on any topic

Since the Constitution does not give the Supreme Court the power of judicial review over congressional authorizations, its Court’s exercise appears to be something of a usurpation. A few representatives anticipated that the courts should practice this power, while numerous others were ‘departmentalists,’ accepting that each branch of the new government would decipher the Constitution as it applied to its very own actions, with the judiciary mainly guaranteeing that people did not endure shameful or injustices acts.

The United States court case of Marbury v Madison (1803) is important because not only did it settle the ambiguity over the framers ’ intentions, but it also established the Supreme Court’s power in a controversial case; the principle of judicial review. This case emerged after Thomas Jefferson supplanted John Adams in the White House. Jefferson’s secretary of state, James Madison, would not convey an official commission to William Marbury, who had been named to a minor office by Adams and affirmed by the Senate just before Adams left the administration. Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to arrange Madison to deliver the commission. Jefferson and his devotees did not accept that the Court had the ability to undertake such an action and might have opposed the request. Chief Justice John Marshall was resolved to declare the intensity of the legal executive yet realized he should avoid a direct confrontation with the president. Likewise, Marshall turned down Marbury’s request yet gave as his explanation the unlawfulness of the enactment whereupon Marbury had based his case. Therefore, Marshall stated the power of judicial review however did as such in a manner that would not incite a fight with Jefferson.

image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.