Scientific And Spiritual Evidence On Existence Of God

Spiritual Evidence:

As indicated by discerning methodology nothing can appear without a producer or a maker. At whatever point we take a gander at something we generally think about its maker. For example, we think about the manufacturer when we see an excellent house while a watch helps us to remember its producer else we can’t legitimize its existence. Subsequently, the universe causes us to notice its Creator. Following focus confirmation the presence of God for example Allah Almighty:

(1) Creation of Universe:

We can’t envision that a universe so huge and minimal can appear without a maker. This efficient and well-organized world welcomes us to acknowledge the presence of Allah Almighty. Allah says in the Holy Quran:

‘Can there be any uncertainty concerning Allah, the Creator of Heavens and the Earth?’ {14:10}

(2) Systematic course of action of Universe:

By taking a gander at the universe we watch exactness, amicability and accuracy. This association guarantees us the presence of a Creator. Allah Almighty says in His Holy Book:

‘[And] who made seven sky in layers. You don’t find in the production of the Most Merciful any irregularity. So return [your] vision [to the sky]; do you see any breaks?’

(3) Movement of the Stars:

The Sun and Moon are moving in their circles. The Sun doesn’t go into the circle of the moon neither one of the moons moves towards Sun. The day and night go inside their fixed calendars. The Holy Quran specifies:

‘It isn’t for the Sun to surpass the moon nor does the night overwhelm the day. They all buoy each in a circle.’

(4) Specific example in the Universe:

Known to man things have been made in a particular extent with the ideal association as the Sacred Book says:

‘Verily all things have We made in extent and measure’

(5) Regularity of Day and Night:

The normality of day and night, the development of the Moon, the Sun, and the Earth shows the nearness of a super and wonderful force, administering it. Allah Almighty says in Holy Quran:

‘Observe! In the production of Heavens and Earth and the variation of night and day, they are for sure signs for men of comprehension.’

(6) Harmony and Artistry in making of Universe:

Agreement and quality of this universe likewise show that it is all the astuteness and aptitude of Allah Almighty. The Holy Quran proclaims:

‘(Such is ) the aesthetics of Allah, Who discard everything in immaculate request.’

(7) Creation of Man:

As the Earth, the sky and the whole universe are proof of the presence of Allah Almighty, man additionally echoes this reality. The Holy Quran challenges the nonbeliever in the accompanying words:

‘Is it accurate to say that they were made of nothing, or would they say they were themselves the makers? Or then again did they make the Heavens and the Earth? Nay, they have no firm conviction’

(8) Human Nature:

An investigation of history shows that the edified just as the savage had the idea of the confidence in presence of Omnipotent Allah Almighty. Archeological research shows that even the crude social orders and countries in Allah Almighty in some structure. So obviously confidence in Allah Almighty is a piece of human instinct. The Sacred Book states Allah Almighty as follows:

‘Allah’s handwork as per the design on which he has made humanity.’

(9) Signs Scattered on Earth and in Us:

On the off chance that we glance around on the Earth and furthermore investigate ourselves, we will come to realize that there must be a Creator. Along these lines, a Hadith is cited as:

‘He who perceives himself perceives God.’

Hadith and statements of Scholars on Existence of God (Allah Almighty):

(1) Al-Bukhariyy, al-Bayhaqiyy and Ibnul-Jarud related that the Messenger of Allah, stated:

‘ Allah existed everlastingly and nothing else existed. ‘

This hadith demonstrates that solitary Allah existed without a start, i.e., before making any of the creation. There was nothing with Allah: no spot, no space, no sky, no Earth, no light, and no dimness. It is resolved in the principles of the Religion and the decisions of the sound psyche that Allah, the Exalted, doesn’t change. Thus, it is inconceivable that in the wake of having been existing without a spot, Allah will change and stay in a spot, since this is an improvement. The improvement is an indication of requiring others, and the person who needs others isn’t God.

(2) Imam Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi related in his book, Al-Farqu Baynal-Firaq, that Imam Ali, the fourth of the caliphs, may Allah reward his deeds, stated:

‘ Allah existed everlastingly and there was no spot, and He presently is as He might have been. ‘

(3) Imam Abu Hanifah, who is one of the specialists of Salaf, said in his book Al-Fiqh al-Absat:

‘ Allah existed unceasingly and there was no spot. He existed before making the creation. He existed, and there was no spot, creation, or thing. He is the Creator of everything. ‘

(4) Imam Muhammad Ibn Hibah al-Makkiyy, composed a book called Hada’iqul-Fusul wa Jawahirul-^Uqul.

It came to be known as Al-^Aqidatus-Salahiyyah, after he gave it as a blessing to Sultan Salahud-Din al-Ayyubiyy, who requested that this book be educated to the kids in schools and communicate from the highest point of minarets. In his book he stated:

‘ Allah existed endlessly and there was no spot, and the judgment about His reality presently is that He is as He might have been.’

(5) Every person is brought into the world with this characteristic aura, which is brought in Arabic ‘Fitrah’.

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be satisfied with him, has announced that the Messenger of Allah ( ) stated:

‘Each kid is conceived upon Fitrah, at that point it is his folks who make him Jewish, or Christian, or Magian (Zoroastrian), similarly as a creature conveys an ideal infant creature; do you think that its disfigured?’ [Al-Bukhari]

However, this ‘Fitrah’ now and again gets inert, particularly when the individual is in a degenerate and profoundly degenerate condition, which is without update and admonishment towards the Lord. The ‘Fitrah’ surfaces, be that as it may, in the midst of cataclysm and trouble. What number of declared nonbelievers end up lifting their hands to the skies in supplication when in tribulation! What’s more, how do the staunch unbelievers shout out for liberation when they are confronted with death!

Scientific Evidence:

Laws of math

In 1960 the Princeton physicist – and consequent Nobel Prize champ – Eugene Wigner brought up an essential issue: Why did the common world consistently – so far as we probably am aware – obey laws of arithmetic?

As contended by researchers, for example, Philip Davis and Reuben Hersh, science exists autonomous of physical reality. It is the activity of mathematicians to find the real factors of this different universe of scientific laws and ideas. Physicists at that point put the arithmetic to use as per the guidelines of expectation and affirmed perception of the logical strategy.

Yet, present-day arithmetic for the most part is defined before any characteristic perceptions are made, and numerous numerical laws today have no known existing physical analogs.

Einstein’s 1915 general hypothesis of relativity, for instance, depended on hypothetical science created 50 years sooner by the incomparable German mathematician Bernhard Riemann that didn’t have any known useful applications at the hour of its scholarly creation.

Sometimes the physicist likewise finds the arithmetic. Isaac Newton was considered among the best mathematicians just as physicists of the seventeenth century. Different physicists looked for his assistance in finding arithmetic that would foresee the functions of the nearby planetary group. He discovered it in the numerical law of gravity, situated to a limited extent on his disclosure of analytics.

At that point, be that as it may, numerous individuals at first opposed Newton’s decisions since they were by all accounts ‘mysterious.’ How could two far off items in the close planetary system be drawn toward each other, acting as per an exact numerical law? For sure, Newton put forth strenuous attempts over his lifetime to locate a characteristic clarification, yet at last he could state just that it is the desire of God.

In spite of the numerous different tremendous advances of present day material science, little has changed right now. As Wigner expressed, ‘the colossal handiness of arithmetic in the characteristic sciences is something verging on the puzzling and there is no sound clarification for it.’

At the end of the day, as I contend in my book, it takes the presence of an a divine being to make the scientific underpinnings of the universe understandable.

Math and different universes

In 2004 the incomparable physicist Roger Penrose set forward a dream of a universe made out of three freely existing universes – arithmetic, the material world and human cognizance. As Penrose recognized, it was a finished riddle to him how the three associated with each other outside the capacity of any logical or another routinely judicious model.

By what means can physical particles and atoms, for instance, make something that exists in a different area that has no physical presence: human awareness?

It is a puzzle that lies past science.

This secret is a similar one that existed in the Greek perspective of Plato, who accepted that unique thoughts (over all scientific) first existed outside any physical reality. The material world that we experience as a component of our human presence is a blemished impression of these earlier proper beliefs. As the researcher of old Greek way of thinking, Ian Mueller, writes in ‘Science And The Divine,’ the domain of such beliefs is that of God.

Surely, in 2014 the MIT physicist Max Tegmark contends in ‘Our Mathematical Universe’ that science is the principal world reality that drives the universe. As I would state, arithmetic is working in a divine resembling style.

The puzzle of human cognizance

The activities of human cognizance are correspondingly inexplicable. Like the laws of arithmetic, awareness has no physical nearness on the planet; the pictures and considerations in our cognizance have no quantifiable measurements.

However, our nonphysical musings by one way or another bafflingly control the activities of our physical human bodies. This is no more deductively logical than the secretive capacity of nonphysical numerical developments to decide the functions of a different physical world.

As of not long ago, the logically impossible nature of human awareness hindered the academic conversation of the subject. Since the 1970s, be that as it may, it has become the main region of request among savants.

Perceiving that he was unable to accommodate his own logical realism with the presence of a nonphysical universe of human cognizance, a main agnostic, Daniel Dennett, in 1991 made the extreme stride of denying that awareness even exists.

Discovering this through and through unlikely, as the vast majority do, another driving logician, Thomas Nagel, wrote in 2012 that, given the experimentally baffling – the ‘recalcitrant’ – character of human cognizance, ‘we should desert [scientific] realism’ as a total reason for understanding the universe of human presence.

As a skeptic, Nagel doesn’t offer strict conviction as another option, however, I would contend that the powerful character of the activities of human awareness includes the reason for raising the likelihood of the presence of a heavenly god.

Discourse Of Dr.Craig:

Dr. Craig: pleasant night. I need to start by saying thanks to the Faith and Science Lecture Forum for welcoming me to take an interest in today around evening time’s discussion, and I’m pleased that you have turned out on a stormy night to consider this generally significant of inquiries with us this evening.

Presently in this evening’s discussion, we have been asked to address two essential inquiries:

1. What is the proof for the presence of God?
2. What is the proof against the presence of God?

Presently, concerning that subsequent inquiry, I will surrender it over to Dr. Atkins to show the proof against God’s presence. In any case, notice that agnostics have gone after for quite a long time to invalidate the presence of God, yet nobody has ever had the option to concoct an effective contention. In this way, as opposed to assault straw men, I’ll simply stand by to hear Dr. Atkins’ response to the accompanying inquiry: ‘What great proof is there to imagine that God doesn’t exist?’

Along these lines, we should go to that first question. What great proof is there to feel that God does exist? I accept that there are numerous explanations behind the presence of God, yet because of the cutoff points of time, I will limit myself to portraying quickly five reasons why I think God exists. Presently in the entirety of our thinking, we must be mindful so as to observe the essential standards of rationale, which have administered all substantial thinking since Aristotle.

The starting point of the universe. Have you at any point asked yourself where the universe originated from? Why everything exists rather than simply nothing? Commonly, agnostics have said that the universe is simply everlasting and uncaused. In any case, the astrophysical proof demonstrates that the universe started to exist in an incredible blast called the Big Bang fifteen billion years back. Most laymen don’t welcome that in addition to the fact that all were matter and vitality made in that occasion, however physical reality themselves. This is of most extreme significance, for it suggests, as the Cambridge space expert Fred Hoyle brings up, that the Big Bang hypothesis requires the production of the universe from nothing.

Presently, this will in general be ungainly for the agnostic. For as Anthony Kenny of Oxford University asks, an advocate of the Big Bang hypothesis, in any event on the off chance that he is a skeptic, must accept that the universe originated from nothing and by nothing. In any case, most likely that doesn’t bode well. From nothing, nothing comes. So where did the universe originate from? For what reason does the universe exist rather than simply nothing? There more likely than not been a reason which brought the universe into being. We can abridge our contention so far as follows.

1. Whatever starts to exist has a reason.
2. The universe started to exist.
3. Hence, the universe has a reason.

Presently from the very idea of the case, as the reason for existence, this reason must be an uncaused, immutable, immortal, and irrelevant being of unfathomable force, which made the universe. It must be ageless, and subsequently unchanging, on the grounds that it made time. Since it likewise made space, it must rise above space also, and in this way be unimportant, not physical.

In addition, I would contend, it should likewise be close to home. For an unchanging, unoriginal reason can never exist without its impact. On the off chance that the invariable, unoriginal conditions for an impact are immortally present, at that point their impact must be agelessly present also. For instance, the reason for water’s freezing is the temperature being beneath zero degrees centigrade. On the off chance that the temperature were underneath zero from time everlasting, at that point any water around would be solidified from time everlasting. It would be inconceivable for the water to simply start to freeze a limited time prior. The main route for the reason to be ageless and for the impact to start a limited time back is for the reason to be an individual specialist who unreservedly decides to make another impact with no earlier deciding conditions. For instance, a man sitting from time everlasting could unreservedly will to stand up and consequently you would have another impact emerge from an interminable reason. Furthermore, in this manner, we are brought not just to an extraordinary reason for the universe yet to its own Creator.