Essays on Judiciary

The conflict between different approaches to determine whether a defendant owes a claimant a duty of care has long been debated. Over the years, the courts have moved between ‘traditional’ approaches and different generalised tests, trying to find one common ‘test’ that can be applied to all cases when determining a duty of care. Whether...

The court proceeding in which a judge review lawfulness of a decision or action taken by Public body is known as Judicial Review. The judicial review is sort of split in two main sections firstly bringing case for judicial review and secondly the actual grounds for judicial review. Bringing a case for Judicial Review there...

On the 8th of July 2019, Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt thanked the Bishop of Truro for his commissioned review on the persecution of Christians worldwide, and his concluding statements on the support of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), or lack thereof. The review stated that the ‘geographic spread of anti-Christian persecution ’ was indicative...

Introduction Judicial Precedent is a highlight of the English lawful system is that judges can make laws by their call in court. On the off chance that the choice is of the next level court, it can work as an official point of reference which needs to be followed by other judges in afterward cases....

A judgement of a court referred to as a specialist for choosing a similar set of realities, a case which serves as power for the legitimate standard typifies in its choice. The common law has created by expanding down from precedent to precedent. A legal precedent is a choice of the court utilized as a...

Judicial review is the intensity of the courts to render an official conclusion when there is a contention of elucidation of the Constitution or laws between the courts and Congress, the courts and the official branch, or the courts and the states. In more straightforward terms judicial review is the intensity of the courts to...

The Law of Precedent is a principle arising from stare decisis, Latin for “let the decision stand”. The basic concept is that a ruling reached in a previous case is to be considered as binding law to all proceeding cases with the same ratio decidendi. This essay will differentiate persuasive and binding precedents. It will...

In this essay, we will be introducing marital rape, we are going to look at one article of Marianne giles which talks about the judicial law making in the criminal courts, and we will evaluate it using cases and scenarios. In addition, we will also, outline the advantages and disadvantages of the judge-made law. Firstly,...

Administrative law is regarded and described as a body of law and legal framework which regulates governments powers. Such government powers develop from statute law, the Royal Prerogative and legislation from the EU. The most significant purpose of administrative law is to control decision making on the basis of these powers. Decisions made by governments,...

This assignment will be answering the two following questions which are: What is the purpose of precedent in English Law and Judges can interpret any statute in accordance with established rules developed in English Law, give a summary of these rules and explain the advantages and disadvantages of each. What is judicial precedent and how...