Military Interventions: Russia In Ukraine As A Case Study
Russian political actions
Russia’s political elite in Ukraine implemented financial sanctions on Thursday, in frozen Russian assets, hundreds of politicians and officials, in addition to dozens of state-owned Ukrainian companies, the decree said that personal target companies will be frozen The financial and real estate assets in Russia will not be able to bring them back to Ukraine, the relationship between Moscow and Kiev, because Russia’s Crimea Russia annexed in 2014 and the pro-Russian split rebellion in the eastern part of Ukraine is deteriorating (world news,2018).
Politics and Russian law discuss how the influence of Ukrainian politics in conflict in Russia. They include a discussion of the role of Russia in the early stages of the conflict in Donbas, and there are two reasons for the reasons for increasing the regime after Putin and his direct annexation in Crimea, and on how the Russian government is political to Russia. System of Crimean integration of popular support for articles (Gorenburg, 2016).
What is Crimea?
Under the hostile occupation of Russia, Crimea is regarded as the Ukrainian region by most countries in the world. Russia is a historical and historical part of Russia, helping to liberate Russia in March. Geographically, this is a very important website on the Black Sea and a strategically important site that has been playing for hundreds of years because Ukraine was independent in 1991 until February 2014, a special military base for regional autonomy in Ukraine. And large Russian (types such as how the United States has rules in Japan and Germany). Importantly, Crimea spent a long time before 1991 as part of the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire and most of the citizens of the Russians, in late February, the pro-Moscow power of the President of Ukraine overthrew for a few days, the Gunners The blame gang began to take over the building after the Crimean government. Some systems have demonstrated in Crimea to show their support for the overthrown president and, in some cases, to Ukraine to separate and join Russia. The guerrillas grew until it became obvious that they were Russian troops, which put the entire peninsula under military occupation. On March 16, Crimea voted with an overwhelming majority. They became part of Russia. Most countries in the world believe that the illegal division of Crimea is voted for several reasons: it is a Russian military without international supervision and hostility. A large number of reports of occupations, and intimidation, have been paid only during the two-week warning period, which is illegal under Ukrainian law. Whether legal or not, Crimea has actually become part of Russia. The United States and the European Union have imposed economic sanctions on Russia to punish Moscow for this, but there is no indication that Crimea will return to Ukraine (Fisher, 2014).
The Annexation of Crimea
Many people in Crimea and eastern Ukraine were disturbed by the protests of Euromaidan and the changes caused by the government. Although the protests continue, many Ukrainians protest against Russia. On February 26, fighting broke out between pro-Russian demonstrators and the Crimean Tatars who protested the new Ukrainian government. Most experts believe that they are members of the Russian Special Forces. Although Putin initially denied Russia’s military presence in Crimea, he later confirmed that “green youth” were Russian soldiers. A few weeks later, Crimea was isolated from the rest of Ukraine (Penn, 2019).
In February 2014, Russian officials began to arrive in the Crimea and the pro-Western government soon took power in Kiev, raising concerns about the Russian legacy in parts of Ukraine, including the Crimean attack. Soon, the troops did not have a badge in Crimea, occupying important infrastructure including the Ukrainian military base. The Kremlin refused. He sent a message to the Korean peninsula. Only after the president Putin publicly admitted that it was actually a Russian army. In the spring of 2014, the Ukrainian troops did not resist the recession to a large extent. It was a leader of the split and Russian officers. The Igor Gherkin was later said how Russian officers and other local legislators were forced to quit by calling for a referendum. The federal motion to join Russia. The majority of the votes cast on March 16, 2014 supported the proposal. Two days later, Moscow signed a statement with self-styled Crimean officials to seal the merger. The United Nations does not recognize voting or annexation (News, 2018).
The annexation of Crimea in Russia is a very cruel event. These events must be analyzed and presented very carefully; otherwise reality and fiction will be confused in Western concepts. By reminding ourselves of the actual sequence of events in 2014 and the long and diverse history of the Crimean peninsula, we can avoid inadvertently buying Russian narratives that are currently legalized for annexation. The Crimean Peninsula was annexed by the Russian Federation in February–March 2014 and since then has been administered as two Russian federal subjects—the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol. The annexation from Ukraine followed a Russian military intervention in Crimea that took place in the aftermath of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution and was part of wider unrest across southern and eastern Ukraine (Carnegieeurope, 2017).
The Crimea crisis
The coast of the Russian coast ships in the Ukrainian naval ship strait, from the Azov Sea, caused by six sailors Ukraine, robbed in the vicinity of the Black Sea near the ship and the crew eventually injured the fire, which is annexed between the two neighboring countries from Crimea The first public military confrontation. Ukraine stated that its vessel traveled to the Azov Sea on the International Maritime Rules Line, while Russia accused it of failing to obtain a permit to cross the narrow strait, extending across the length of the 19km bridge completed by Russia this year. Although the 2003 treaty was set in the Kerch Strait and the Azov waters, but Russia sought to exert greater control over the annexation of the corridor, and the dispute between Taghreed Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Clemkin was not accidental and Russia had engaged in ‘The planned hostilities deliberately’, while Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov accused Kiev of what he called ‘provocation’ and added: ‘Ukraine undoubtedly hopes to get extra benefits from this situation and expects the United States and Europe to adopt colonial blindness. ‘Clemkin said he told reporters that in Kiev, the government is in red with the cross talk to ensure that the crew treat prisoners prisoners. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov did not say whether the Kremlin considered their prisoners of war and at the Security Council meeting, Nikki Harry’s US ambassador to China urged Russia to “immediately stop illegal actions” in the Black Sea , Anne Goagn, Deputy Permanent Representative of France. At the United Nations, he urged the release of crew and ships, but the work described by Russia and Ukraine was ‘serious.’ Tell Mede Polyanskiy, the first Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations, the Security Council, this incident is another example of the Ukrainian leader’s attempt to provoke Russia for political purposes (News, 2018).
The crisis began in November, when Victor Yanukovych under the pressure of the then Ukrainian president, Russia, put his back business deal with the EU to accept plans from Moscow, worth $15 billion before the bailout. This led to three months of street protests that led to the overthrow of Pejanokovic on February 22, who condemned the Moscow incident, described it as an illegal coup and refused to recognize the new Ukrainian authorities. In late February, the Russian army occupied the Crimea with a non-blood military takeover. The February 2014 revolution that ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych sparked a political crisis in Crimea, which initially manifested as demonstrations against the new interim Ukrainian government, but rapidly escalated (World News, 2014).
Weapons supply
With the stagnant peace process, and in the Ukrainian, in the US Congress, US President Barack Obama and European allies, the pressure on both sides, the government to provide weapons to the country suffered a war-defying violent escalation of joint violence, the Senate has been included in its counter-insurgency The system and ammunition armed forces Ukrainian military policy drafts of mortars, grenade launchers and ammunition to help fight against Russian-backed separatists. The ministry will also prevent more than half of the aid from spending $300 million in Ukraine unless it is allocated 20% offensive weapons cents. The House of Representatives passed a similar measure. So far, the Obama administration has refused to provide fatal aid, fearing that it will lead to an escalation of bloodshed, and giving Russian President Putin, the Russian president as an excuse for further invasion, pushing legislators to strengthen the siege. The army threatened Ukraine to open the dispute between the United States and its allies, especially Germany and France, when the Obama administration is trying to show up for Russia, which is due to the expansion of European economic sanctions due at the end of July to support the unified time (Steinhauer,etl, 2015).
The Trump administration on Thursday approved a massive new weapons sale to Ukraine, as that country continues to defend itself against Russian-backed separatists.The decision represents a show of force against Russian President Vladimir Putin, as the United States and its allies continue to accuse Moscow of destabilizing eastern Europe and the Middle East through the use of military incursions and cyber warfare.The $47 million sale includes 210 Javelin anti-tank missiles and 37 launch units, the State Department said, and it comes less than three months after the administration approved a similar lethal defensive weapons sale. This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by improving the security of Ukraine, The Javelin system will help Ukraine build its long-term defense capacity to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity in order to meet its national defense requirements (Desiderio, 2018).
Ukraine response
According to Kiev, the Ukrainian president proposed a martial law after Russian troops attacked and captured three Ukrainian naval vessels in the Black Sea, causing six crew members to be injured. This is a major escalation of tension between the two countries. Outside the Russian Embassy in Kiev. Some people put paper boats out of the house, while others threw smoke bombs and set fire to the tires stacked outside (Greenfield, 2018).
Officials at the Ministry of Defence and the US government’s Foreign Ministry said here today that the US Department of Defense is working to support the US response coordinator’s recent aggression against Ukraine in Russia and to help allies Ukraine and the United States and their partners in the region, The United States focuses on Russian diplomatic and economic pressures, cancels the Ukrainian crisis, and continues to participate in the management and defense of senior officials with their Russian counterparts. Foreign Minister John Kerry will meet with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, for example, already in the United States This week announced a package of economic aid to the 1 billion countries [R Ukraine, the EU announced a package of aid programs worth $15 billion, President Obama released this morning to allow the government to start implementing personal and physical implementation of financial sanctions in Russia, who stole Ukrainian assets, engaging in destabilizing activities, or taking a trip are illegal administrative orders. The government also imposes visa restrictions to be responsible for violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as the Department of Defense’s significant contribution to the United States and international efforts to support Ukraine. Summarized the Employees General Martin E. Dempsey, the Department’s activities, this morning the Joint Staff Headquarters defense of Hagel and the Chief Minister and their defense budget for the FY2015 requirements before the House Military Committee testified, such as Hegel Say. Supporting government efforts, including measures taken by Obama to impose diplomatic and economic pressure on Russia and continued cooperation with European partners (Pellerin, 2010).
US and NATO military response
For more than two decades, NATO has been committed to building partnerships with Russia and conducting dialogue and pragmatic cooperation in areas of common interest. Since 2014, cooperation has been suspended in response to Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, but political and military communication channels remain open. Regarding Russia’s continuing unstable military activities and the model of transcending Ukrainian aggression, suspended in the framework of the Norwegian Refugee Council and Russia’s framework for all military and civilian affairs cooperation in April 2014, responding to Russian military intervention and aggression in Ukraine Action, as well as the illegal occupation of the annexation of Crimea, in which the Allies condemned in the strongest terms. But the political and military channels of communication remain unimpeded, the exchange of information on related issues, reducing misunderstandings, and increasing the ability to predict problems (Nato, 2019).
We also emphasize the United States’ support for Ukraine in all aspects, including the provision of capable defensive weapons. The Obama administration has slowed down and encouraged Russia, and the Trump National Security Team is particularly strong at this point. In addition to the tactical system of resistance to the atmosphere, ammunition, radar, communications equipment, etc., the United States should also provide the corresponding level of training and consulting services, using NATO as a means to do this, saying: cooperation between NATO and Ukraine Play an important role in this position. The team can provide a reassuring voice for Ukrainians, who are clearly moving towards war. President Petro Poroshenko successfully declared martial law for 30 days and his defense mechanism has been launched. Obviously, he believes that Russia’s move may strengthen the overall control of the Donbass region in southeastern Ukraine. Putin may have calculated that when Muller came to the United States, the president and his team would be distracted at the end of the year and the holiday season. This gives us another reason to make NATO a core and to carry out this confrontation between the United States and Russia, which will better protect what we have (Stavridis, 2018).
A spokesman for NATO on November 29 said that the reaction of European leaders and NATO has responded to the call of President Poroshenko of Ukraine to take new measures to strengthen defense and punish Russian shooting of Ukrainian ships and crew leaving the gram Crimea. After the accident, there was no plan to send a warship to the Azov Sea, which is located between the territory of Ukraine and Russia, such as Poroshenko demanded November 28, and stipulated sanctions for the United States and Russia, because Crimea is In 2014, it was included in the illegal Black Sea region and began to support Ukrainian separatists in killing more than 10,300 people in war with the government (Europe, 2018).
NATO plans to expand its surveillance in the Black Sea to ensure that Ukrainian ships travel safely through an area effectively controlled by Russia, The Kerch Strait, which connects the Black Sea with the Sea of Azov, has become a flashpoint between Moscow and the West after Russia seized three Ukrainian ships and 24 sailors in November. Ukraine has accused Moscow of military aggression, while Russia claims the boats illegally crossed its border near Crimea. The U.S. plans to offer a package to NATO up surveillance — both air surveillance as well as more of the NATO country ships going into the Black Sea” in support of Ukraine.
